Much of the hiring process
remains manual and slow.
Many eRecruit Systems don’t reduce workload, they just take a paper process and put it onscreen. Coordinating panels and candidates, chasing availability and responses, taking notes, consolidating assessments, and drafting the report are all still largely manual tasks. And the workload gets much worse with bulk intake rounds.
Work piles up in the middle of the hiring process.
Too much admin, not enough time.
Nguma automates the process, not the decision.
Nguma takes the administration out of the selection process. Your panel keeps the judgement, and the record of how it reached its decision is produced as the process runs rather than written from memory afterwards.
Plays nicely with others
Nguma can replace or integrate with your existing eRecruit System, whichever suits your Agency, and can connect to systems like your HRIS and CRM. It works with the meeting tools your panels already use, so there is nothing new for them to learn.
No screening, scoring, or ranking
Nguma does not compare an application against your criteria and produce a verdict. Intake means extraction and structuring only. Nguma removes the administration of shortlisting, not the judgement: a panel member makes every call, and Nguma records who decided what, when, and on what basis.
Your candidates never train a model
Customer applications, audio, transcripts, and metadata are contractually prohibited from training or improving any AI model. A candidate assessed in your process cannot carry that outcome into another process, in your Agency or in any other organisation. Nothing about them is learned, retained, or reused beyond the matter for which it was collected.
Every framework your Agency is required to meet.
Four themes cover the obligations Australian Government agencies carry in recruitment. Select a theme to see Nguma’s approach and every instrument it answers to.
- The panel assesses; Nguma scribes.
- No candidate is screened, scored, or ranked by the platform at any stage.
- Conflict-of-interest declarations are captured per panellist before deliberation.
- Every decision is documented, attributable and exportable for review.
- Pool records are held in a structure that can be exported to your jurisdiction’s sharing format.
Commonwealth: Public Service Act 1999, s 10A; APS Commissioner’s Directions 2022; APSC Circular 2025/07
PASSNSW: Government Sector Employment Act 2013, s 7; GSE Rules
PASSVIC: Public Administration Act 2004, s 8; VPSC binding standards
PASSQLD: Public Sector Act 2022
PASSSA: Public Sector Act 2009, s 46; Premier’s Direction: Recruitment; Commissioner’s Determination 1
PASSWA: Public Sector Management Act 1994, s 8; Commissioner’s Instructions
PASSTAS: State Service Act 2000, s 7; Employment Directions
PASSNT: Public Sector Employment and Management Act; NTPS Recruitment and Selection Policy
PASSACT: Public Sector Management Act 1994, merit and equity principle
PASS- Consent is captured automatically at the start of every session, logged and timestamped.
- Data is scoped to the role it was collected for, with no cross-purpose use.
- No personal information, audio, or metadata is transferred, stored, or processed offshore: application data and records are held in AWS’s Sydney region, and speech-to-text runs on an Australian-only instance.
- AES-256 encryption at rest and in transit, across the whole platform.
- Role-based access controls, with a full log of every access event, timestamped and attributable.
Commonwealth: Privacy Act 1988, APPs 3, 6, 8 and 11
PASSNSW: Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998
PASSVIC: Privacy and Data Protection Act 2014
PASSQLD: Information Privacy Act 2009, as amended by IPOLA
PASSSA: Information Privacy Principles Instruction (Cabinet Administrative Instruction 1/89); PC012
PASSWA: Privacy and Responsible Information Sharing Act 2024
PASSTAS: Personal Information Protection Act 2004
PASSNT: Information Act 2002
PASSACT: Information Privacy Act 2014; ACT agencies also fall under the federal Privacy Act
PASSEssential Eight Maturity Level 2, ASD baseline cyber security controls
IN PROGRESSISO 27001, information security management system
IN PROGRESSISO 42001, AI management system
IN PROGRESSHosted using IRAP assessed infrastructure at the Protected level
PLANNED- Nguma makes no decision about any candidate at any point, which answers the human accountability and merit principles directly.
- Every AI-assisted output requires human review and approval before it becomes the record, with reasoning visible and overridable.
- Customer data is contractually prohibited from training any model.
- Because no assessment is automated, every outcome traces to a named person and a documented reason, which is what transparency and contestability require.
National framework for the assurance of AI in Government, agreed by Data and Digital Ministers, 21 June 2024; Australia’s AI Ethics Principles
PASSCommonwealth: APSC Principles for agency use of AI in recruitment, which agencies were expected to implement by 1 June 2026; Policy for the responsible use of AI in Government (DTA, updated December 2025); AI Plan for the APS 2025; DISR GfAA AI6
PASSNSW: AI Ethics Policy and AI Assessment Framework, mandatory under Circular DCS-2024-04
PASSVIC: National framework adopted directly; PROV AI Technologies and Recordkeeping Policy; Administrative Guideline for Generative AI
PASSQLD: QGEA Artificial intelligence governance policy; QGEA Use of Generative AI
PASSSA: Across-Government guideline on the safe use of generative AI in Government contexts
PASSWA: WA AI Policy Framework (2024), Office of Digital Government
PASSTAS: Aligned to the national framework; no separate published assurance framework
PASSNT: NT AI Assurance Framework
PASSACT: ACT Government Artificial Intelligence Policy
PASS- All interfaces meet WCAG 2.1 AA.
- Screen reader support, keyboard navigation, and sufficient colour contrast are verified across candidate-facing and Agency-facing workflows.
WCAG 2.1 AA is the common baseline for Australian Government digital services
PASSDisability Discrimination Act 1992 applies nationally to candidate-facing services
PASSWhat’s in use today. Why it creates risk.
The tools below are capable and widely used across Government Agencies. None were designed for the Australian regulatory environment. When your CISO or a candidate asks the compliance question, the answer isn’t straightforward.
Audio processed on US servers
The popular US-based meeting transcription tools route interview audio and transcript data through servers in the United States. Under APP 8 of the Privacy Act 1988, transferring personal information offshore without adequate contractual safeguards is a breach, even if unintentional. Whether a given tool’s terms clear that bar is a question your Agency has to answer for each one, before it is used on a candidate.
Data residency is region-dependent
Meeting AI features built into the major conferencing platforms route to data centres that vary by tenant configuration and are not guaranteed to stay onshore in Australia. For Government tenancies with strict data residency requirements, verifying that AI processing remains in-country requires explicit configuration that is often not in place by default. AI model training opt-outs are typically at the enterprise tier.
No audit trail; APP 11 exposure
Interview notes stored in personal drives, Outlook folders, or shared SharePoint libraries without proper access controls create exposure under APP 11 (data security). When a selection decision is challenged at the Merit Protection Commissioner, notes written from memory after the fact, without a contemporaneous record, are difficult to defend. There is no audit trail showing who accessed what, when, or whether the record is complete.
Buying Nguma satisfies your procurement obligations.
Nguma is majority Indigenous-owned and controlled, and Supply Nation registered. Every purchase contributes directly to your Indigenous procurement targets and can be made without a formal tender process.
Indigenous Procurement Policy
CPR Exemption 16 permits direct purchase from an Indigenous SME at any contract value, with a simple value-for-money quote and no tender. The Mandatory Set-Aside gives Indigenous SMEs first consideration within its threshold band, where Nguma sits.
Aboriginal Procurement Policy
Agencies are directed to consider Aboriginal businesses first, with direct engagement pathways for eligible contracts. Nguma spend counts toward your agency’s reporting under the policy.
Social Procurement Framework
Purchasing from Aboriginal businesses is a defined social procurement objective. Nguma spend counts toward your department’s reporting against the framework.
Queensland Procurement Policy 2026
Buying from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander businesses is embedded in Queensland’s procurement objectives. Nguma spend counts toward your entity’s reporting.
Aboriginal Economic Participation Strategy
An across-Government target directs a minimum share of agency spend to Aboriginal businesses and ACCOs, administered through the Office of the Industry Advocate.
Aboriginal Procurement Policy
Mandates progressive targets for the award of contracts to Aboriginal businesses and ACCOs, applying to all contracts above its threshold.
No dedicated policy
Tasmania does not currently operate a dedicated Aboriginal procurement policy. Nguma’s Supply Nation registration still evidences Indigenous ownership for agencies applying their own reconciliation or social procurement commitments.
Aboriginal Procurement Policy
Applies above a low contract threshold. Agencies report on contracts awarded to Aboriginal Business Enterprises, alongside Value for Territory assessment.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Procurement Policy
Territory entities must identify opportunities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander enterprises and are encouraged to seek quotes from them, using Supply Nation’s Indigenous Business Direct where no Canberra-region supplier is suitable.
Portfolio targets. Every Commonwealth portfolio carries annual Indigenous procurement targets by number of contracts and by contract value under the Indigenous Procurement Policy, which was strengthened in May 2026 with revised criteria applying from 1 July 2026. Buying Nguma contributes to both figures. State and territory reporting varies by jurisdiction. We provide letters of engagement and participation data formatted for your Agency’s reporting requirements on request.
Questions your procurement team will ask.
Does Nguma screen, score, or rank applicants?
No. Nguma does not compare an application against your selection criteria and produce a verdict, and it does not score, rank, or filter candidates at any stage. Application intake means extraction and structuring only: the material a candidate submitted, organised so a panel member can read and assess it quickly. The assessment is the panel’s, and Nguma records who decided what, when, and on what basis. This is a deliberate design position tied to the merit principle, not a limitation we intend to remove.
Does Nguma replace our eRecruit System?
No. Nguma works alongside your eRecruit System. Most eRecruit Systems digitised the selection process without removing the manual work inside it: coordination, scheduling, note-taking, assessment consolidation, and report drafting are all still done by hand. Nguma automates that administration and returns the structured, auditable record to your process. Integration with commonly used eRecruit System platforms is on the roadmap.
Which parts of the selection process does Nguma cover today?
Available now: application and CV intake, interview scheduling and candidate coordination, panel interview scribing, moderation session scribing, and generation of individual assessments and full Selection Reports, all with a complete audit trail and merit pool records formatted for APSC Circular 2025/07. Coming soon: facilitated shortlisting, candidate assessment through questions and answers, and reference checking. We will not describe a capability as available until it is.
Is Nguma compliant with merit and Merit Protection requirements?
Yes. Nguma is purpose-built for APS Merit Protection compliance. It supports merit-based selection under the Public Service Act 1999 by capturing the panel’s assessment against your selection criteria, documenting every panel decision with full reasoning, and maintaining a complete audit trail exportable for Merit Protection Commissioner review or its state equivalent. Conflict-of-interest declarations are captured per panellist before deliberation begins. The panel assesses; Nguma scribes. No AI makes a decision about any candidate.
Where is our data hosted? Does it leave Australia?
All data is processed and stored in Australia, with the application database and records held in Australian data centres and speech-to-text processed in Australia. Applications, candidate personal information, interview recordings, meeting transcripts, and selection documentation are never stored or processed outside Australia. Full architecture and data-residency documentation is available under NDA for security assessment. Nguma does not transfer customer data offshore for storage in the ordinary course of the service.
What evidence does Nguma provide if a selection decision is challenged?
Nguma produces a complete, exportable audit trail covering the full selection process: the assessment framework, the applications as received, the panel’s shortlisting decisions and who made them, conflict-of-interest declarations, interview transcripts, the moderation record, panel scoring with individual member contributions, and the finalised Selection Report. Every action is timestamped and attributable to a named person. Because no stage of the assessment is automated, every outcome traces back to a human decision and a documented reason. That contemporaneous record is significantly more defensible than notes written from memory after the fact.
Has Nguma undergone IRAP assessment?
An IRAP assessment at the Official: Sensitive level is planned and will be initiated following current ISO 27001 and Essential Eight ML2 certification work. Agencies with specific IRAP requirements should contact us to discuss their needs and timeline directly.
Can my Agency purchase Nguma under the Indigenous procurement framework?
Yes. Nguma is majority Indigenous-owned and controlled and Supply Nation registered. Commonwealth Procurement Rule Exemption 16 permits direct purchase at any contract value with a simple value-for-money quote, with no formal tender process required. The Mandatory Set-Aside applies within its threshold band. NSW, Victoria, ACT, and Queensland state policies also provide direct purchase pathways. Every Nguma purchase counts toward your Indigenous procurement targets.
Ready to get started?
Set up your Agency’s workspace in minutes. No payment needed until you’re ready to run your first selection process.